Python, Be Bold! - The Draft
No, i did not write that, it's not Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote rather
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: *AAKASH JANA* <aakashjana2002 at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 21:15
Subject: Re: Python, Be Bold! - The Draft
To: Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer <arj.python at gmail.com>
Please forward it to aakashjana2002 at gmail.com
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, 01:21 Michael Torrie, <torriem at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/6/20 10:24 AM, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> > Maybe but if you know or have heard of Julia the language. You will
> > its going to take over what python gives us. So i think there is urgent
> > need for upgrades to newer versions of python to make basic tasks on
> > way quicker.
> No it sure won't. You can't possibly make such a blanket statement.
> Julia might replace python for some users, perhaps those involved in
> data science, but Python stands on its own merits. And currently that
> standing is pretty good. If that changes in the future, oh well.
> Languages come and go. Besides all that, if some users find Julia fits
> their need better, why is that a bad thing? You talk like it's a zero
> sum game. It's not. I don't see where this urgency is coming from.
> Put in another way, Python fills the needs of many users at present.
> This isn't going to magically change because you see something that is
> deficient in your opinion.