codehaus


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[oslo] following or not following the DST changes for our meeting time


On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 7:56 AM Moises Guimaraes de Medeiros <
moguimar at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Hervé,
>
> Historically, Oslo team meeting has been at 1500 UTC, which translates to
> 3PM UTC,
> I think the discussed proposal in the oslo irc meeting was 1500 UTC with
> DST and
> 1600 UTC without DST, which translates to 3PM UTC and 4PM UTC accordingly.
>
> I other words, that means that we should move the slot from 1500 UTC to
> 1600 UTC
> with the recent time change.
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:51 PM Herve Beraud <hberaud at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Oslofolk,
>>
>> As discussed during our previous meeting, at each DST change, the agenda
>> of some of us conflicting with our Oslo meeting time slot, this thread just
>> wants to propose a solution to avoid that.
>>
>> We could just move our meeting time when DST changes, and then move back
>> to this slot once DST is back.
>>
>> Right now our meeting time is UTC based, we suppose that UTC is required
>> because of the OpenStack meeting tooling.
>>
>> By following that we will get the following time slots:
>>
>> - meeting time slot when DST start: 5:00pm UTC
>>
>> - meeting time slot when DST end: 4:00pm UTC
>>
>> Does it fit well for you?
>>
>> --
>> Hervé Beraud
>> Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
>> irc: hberaud
>> https://github.com/4383/
>> https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+
>> Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+
>> RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP
>> F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G
>> 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g
>> glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw
>> m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ
>> hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0
>> qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y
>> F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3
>> B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O
>> v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o
>> =ECSj
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Moisés Guimarães
>
> Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>


The proposed time slots work for me - no conflicts here.


-- 
Ken Giusti  (kgiusti at gmail.com)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20201119/a330e80f/attachment-0001.html>