codehaus


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[cloudkitty][tc] Cloudkitty abandoned?


We are working on it. So far we have 3 open proposals there, but we do not
have enough karma to move things along.
Besides these 3 open proposals, we do have more ongoing extensions that
have not yet been proposed to the community.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:22 AM Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com>
wrote:

> Posting here to raise awareness, and start discussion about next steps.
>
> It appears there is no one working on Cloudkitty anymore. No patches
> have been merged for several months now, including simple bot proposed
> patches. It would appear no one is maintaining this project anymore.
>
> I know there is a need out there for this type of functionality, so
> maybe this will raise awareness and get some attention to it. But
> barring that, I am wondering if we should start the process to retire
> this project.
>
>  From a Victoria release perspective, it is milestone-2 week, so we
> should make a decision if any of the Cloudkitty deliverables should be
> included in this release or not. We can certainly force releases of
> whatever is the latest, but I think that is a bit risky since these
> repos have never merged the job template change for victoria and
> therefore are not even testing with Python 3.8. That is an official
> runtime for Victoria, so we run the risk of having issues with the code
> if someone runs under 3.8 but we have not tested to make sure there are
> no problems doing so.
>
> I am hoping this at least starts the discussion. I will not propose any
> release patches to remove anything until we have had a chance to discuss
> the situation.
>
> Sean
>
>
>

-- 
Rafael Weingärtner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200730/7abce4d4/attachment.html>