[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problems about subsets clause order for MATCH_RECOGNIZE

I don’t understand MATCH_RECOGNIZE well enough to give an opinion. Is there a query that gives different results on Oracle if you change the order of items in SUBSET?

It seems that the parser preserves the order of items in the subset, but the SqlToRelConverter does not, hence the line "subsets=[[[DOWN, STRT]]” in SqlToRelConverterTest.xml. I would be concerned if the parser re-ordered things, but I am not too concerned about SqlToRelConverter unless the semantics are wrong.

> On Dec 14, 2018, at 12:37 AM, bupt_ljy <bupt_ljy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>  It’s my first time to send emails to Calcite developers. It’s a really good project and many projects benefit from it.
>  Now I’ve encountered a problem about the subsets for MATCH_RECOGNIZE in thetestMatchRecognizeSubset1() testing. From the results, I can tell that"subset stdn = (strt, down)"will be explained to "SUBSET \"STDN\" = (\"DOWN\", \"STRT\”)”, which confuses me. IMO, It’ll affect the result of functions like“FIRST” and“LAST”, which may not be what I want, although it works fine with“AVG” function.
>  I’m not sure if this is a bug, or anyone can tell me how we arrive here?
> Best,
> Jiayi Liao