[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Arrow pull requests: please limit squashing your commits

hi folks,

As the contributor base has grown, our development styles have grown
increasingly diverse.

Sometimes contributors are used to working in a Gerrit-style workflow
where patches are always squashed with `git rebase -i` into a single
patch, and then force pushed to the PR branch.

I'd like to ask you to avoid doing this, as it can make things harder
for maintainers. Let me explain:

* When you rebase and force-push, GitHub fails to generate an e-mail
notification. I use the GitHub notifications to tell which branches
are being actively developed and may need to be reviewed again. Many
times now I have thought a branch was inactive only to look more
closely and see that it's been updated via force-push. Since it took
GitHub 10 years to start showing force push changes at all in their UI
I'm not holding out for them to send e-mail notifications about this

* GitHub is not Gerrit. We don't have the awesome incremental diff
feature. So in lieu of this it's easier to be able to look at
incremental diffs (e.g. responses to code review comments) by clicking
on the individual commits

* Our PR merge tool (dev/ squashes all the commits
anyway, so squashing twice is redundant

Sometimes I'll have commits like this in my branch

* lint
* fixing CI
* fixing toolchain issue
* code review commits
* fixing CI issues
* more code review comments
* documentation

I think it's fine to combine some of the commits this so long as the
produced commits reflect the logical evolution of your patch, for the
purposes of code review.

In the event of a gnarly rebase on master, sometimes it is easiest to
create a single commit and then rebase that.