[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GitHub] activemq-artemis issue #2478: ARTEMIS-2210 PagingStore creation is not prope...

Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
    @gaohoward The synchronized block will block any threads attempting to both getting and creating a paging store, while a chm::get is lock-free ie won't block any threads and chm::computeIfAbsent is locked on per-segment basis (that means that depends on the number of segments and how the hashing of the keys will distribute the entries into the segment.
    Putting a synchronized like this will prevent any threads to do anything on an hot-path, blocking each others: my advice is to keep chm::get lock-free (as it is now) and into `newStore(storeName)` use chm::computeIfAbsent to avoid duplicates creatings of `PagingStore` instances.
    This should keep the scalability as it is now without allocating unnecessary instances. wdyt?